9.1 Definition, Existence, and Basic Properties
The Laplace transform is a tool that turns a differential equation into an algebra problem. You take the transform of every term, the derivatives turn into multiplication by , the initial conditions slip in automatically, and what remains is an equation you can solve with ordinary algebra. At the end you transform back. Engineers use it constantly: it is the language of transfer functions, control systems and circuit analysis.
Before we can use it, we have to know what the transform is, when it exists and how it behaves. That is the job of this section. We will compute a handful of transforms directly from the definition, then collect a small set of rules that let us find almost every transform we need without integrating again.
One change of notation: in this chapter the independent variable is time , and functions are defined for . A differential equation will look like with .
The definition: an improper integral
The transform takes a function and produces a new function of a new variable . It does this by multiplying by the decaying weight and adding up (integrating) over all .
Let be defined for . The Laplace transform of is the function given by
for every real for which this improper integral converges. We use capital letters for transforms: , , .
Recall what an improper integral means. We integrate up to a finite upper limit , and then let grow:
If this limit exists (and is finite), the integral converges; otherwise it diverges and is not defined for that . Typically the integral converges for all larger than some number, and diverges for smaller .
Figure 9.1.1 shows the idea for . For each fixed , the product is a curve, and is the area under it. A larger makes the weight decay faster, so the area shrinks. The transform records how this area depends on .
First transforms from the definition
Start with the constant function . For ,
As , the term goes to because . Hence
For the integral diverges ( for all , so the area is infinite). This is typical: a transform lives on a half-line .
Find , where is a real constant.
Solution
- Combine the exponentials. . Assume , so that .
- Integrate up to .
- Let . Since , . So
- Check the other case. If , the integrand does not decay, and the integral diverges. With we recover .
Find .
Solution
- Integration by parts. On take , , so , (with ):
- Limits. , and also (an exponential beats any power; use L'Hôpital's rule on if in doubt).
- Answer. Repeating the same integration by parts shows that each extra power of brings a factor : . Starting from this gives .
Find and for a real constant .
Solution
We could integrate by parts twice for each one. A shorter route uses Euler's formula .
- Transform of . Repeat Example 9.1.1 with . The only step that needs care is the limit: for . So
- Make the denominator real. Multiply top and bottom by :
- Take real and imaginary parts. The left side is . Comparing parts:
Piecewise continuous functions
In engineering, inputs are often switched on and off: a voltage applied for two seconds, a load removed at a certain moment. Such inputs have jumps. The Laplace transform handles them easily, because an integral does not care about a finite number of jumps.
A function is piecewise continuous on a finite interval if can be split into finitely many subintervals such that is continuous inside each subinterval and has finite one-sided limits at the end points of each subinterval.
In words: finitely many jumps, every jump of finite size, nothing that blows up.
For example, a function equal to on , to on and to afterwards is piecewise continuous on every finite interval. The function is not piecewise continuous on : it blows up at . Neither is on : it has no limit as .
To transform a piecewise function from the definition, split the integral at the jump points.
Let for and for . Find .
Solution
- Split the integral. The part over contributes nothing because there:
- Integrate (for ):
- Answer. . Because the integral runs over a finite interval only, it converges for every (and at the integral is simply ).
Exponential order and the existence theorem
Not every function has a Laplace transform. The weight can tame a function that grows, but only if the growth is not too fast. The next definition makes "not too fast" precise.
A function is of exponential order if there are constants and such that
We say simply "of exponential order" if such an exists.
Some examples:
- Every bounded function (, , a constant, a step) is of exponential order : take as the bound.
- is of exponential order , because .
- Every power is of exponential order for any . For instance, the Taylor series has only positive terms when , so , that is for all .
- is not of exponential order: for any , . No exponential bound can hold for large .
Suppose that
- is piecewise continuous on for every , and
- is of exponential order .
Then exists for every . Moreover as .
Split the integral at the point of Definition 9.1.3. On the function is piecewise continuous, so that finite piece is an ordinary integral. For ,
and converges when (Example 9.1.1). By the comparison test the tail converges too.
The conditions are sufficient, not necessary. For example, blows up at (so it is not piecewise continuous on ), yet its transform exists: . For the equations of this course the theorem covers every forcing we will meet.
The last statement of the theorem gives a quick test: if does not tend to as , it cannot be the transform of a piecewise continuous function of exponential order. For instance, neither nor is such a transform. (In Section 9.4 we meet the delta "function", whose transform is a constant. It is not an ordinary function, so there is no contradiction.)
Linearity
The transform is an integral, and integrals respect sums and constant multiples. So the transform does too.
If exists for and exists for , then for any constants ,
for .
As a first use, the hyperbolic functions follow from the exponential. Since , for
and in the same way . Notice how these resemble the cosine and sine, with replaced by .
Find .
Solution
- Split by linearity. .
- Use the known transforms. , , .
- Answer. (Each term needs its own condition: , , . All hold when .)
The transform of a product is not the product of the transforms. For example , while . Products are handled by special rules: shifting (multiplication by ), multiplication by , and, in Section 9.2, convolution.
A table of transforms
Here are the transforms we use throughout the chapter. Rows 1–7 come from the computations above; rows 8–12 follow from the rules proved below; the last two rows are explained in Section 9.4. Keep this table at hand: solving an equation by Laplace transforms is mostly a matter of reading it forwards and backwards.
| valid for | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | |||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | |||
| 6 | |||
| 7 | |||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | |||
| 10 | |||
| 11 | |||
| 12 | |||
| 13 | |||
| 14 | (unit step) | ||
| 15 | (unit impulse) | all |
Row 13 combines rows 4 and 12 by linearity: equals
It is useful in Section 9.2, where a squared quadratic factor appears in a denominator.
Translation in : the first shifting theorem
What happens to the transform when we multiply by an exponential ? Look at the definition:
The last integral is exactly , evaluated at instead of .
If for , then
Multiplying by in the -world shifts the transform by in the -world: replace every by .
Rows 8–10 of the table follow at once. For example, from we get .
Find (a) , (b) , (c) .
Solution
- (a) Without the exponential, . Here , so replace by :
- (b) . With replace by everywhere, including the numerator:
- (c) First the unshifted transform: Now replace by :
Transforms of derivatives
This is the property that makes the transform useful for differential equations. Let us compute by integrating by parts, with and :
If is of exponential order and , then . Letting :
Differentiation in becomes multiplication by , minus the initial value. Applying the rule to instead of gives the second derivative:
Suppose are continuous on and of exponential order , and is piecewise continuous on for every . Then for ,
In particular
A memory aid for the pattern: the powers of go down while the order of the derivatives goes up, and the two always add up to .
As a quick check, take , with and . The theorem says , so , in agreement with Example 9.1.3.
Suppose solves with , . Find without solving the differential equation.
Solution
- Transform each term. By Theorem 9.1.4 with the given initial values,
- Transform the equation (by linearity, and ):
- Collect the terms.
- Answer. The differential equation has become a linear algebraic equation for , and the initial conditions are already built in. Notice that the factor in front of is the characteristic polynomial . Section 9.2 shows how to turn back into ; Section 9.3 makes this a complete method.
Multiplication by : derivatives of
Multiplying by shifted the transform. Multiplying by differentiates it. To see why, differentiate the definition with respect to (this is allowed for under the hypotheses of Theorem 9.1.1):
Repeating times gives the general rule.
If is piecewise continuous on every and of exponential order , and , then for and
Find (a) , (b) in two ways, (c) .
Solution
- (a) . By the quotient rule, So . This is row 12 of the table with .
- (b) With Theorem 9.1.5. . Then and . With , .
With shifting. ; replace by : . The two methods agree. - (c) First, by Theorem 9.1.5 (or row 11), . Then the factor replaces by :
Use the calculator below to transform your own combinations of , , and . It shows which table row and which rule (linearity, shifting, multiplication by ) it uses for each term, so you can compare with your own steps. The preset is a mix of Examples 9.1.6 and 9.1.8; try replacing it with .
Periodic functions
Many engineering signals repeat: square waves, sawtooth waves, rectified sine waves. If for all , we only need to integrate over one period.
Let be piecewise continuous on and periodic with period . Then for
Split into periods , . On the -th period substitute ; because , the -th piece equals . Adding all pieces gives the geometric series times the one-period integral.
A half-wave rectifier passes the positive half of a sine wave and blocks the negative half. The output is for , for , repeated with period (Figure 9.1.3). Find .
Solution
- One-period integral. Only contributes. Use (check by differentiating):
- Apply Theorem 9.1.6 with :
- Simplify. Factor and cancel:
- Use linearity to split the function into simple terms.
- Look up each basic term in Table 9.1.1.
- A factor : find the transform without it, then replace by (first shifting theorem).
- A factor : find the transform without it, then differentiate times and multiply by .
- Piecewise functions: integrate piece by piece from the definition (or, faster, use the step functions of Section 9.4). Periodic functions: integrate over one period and divide by .
Exercises
- Use the definition to find when for , for , and for .
Answer
- Use the definition to find when for and for .
Answer
- Find .
Answer
, - Find .
Answer
- Find .
Answer
- Use Theorem 9.1.5 to find .
Answer
, - Find .
Answer
- Decide whether each function is of exponential order: (a) , (b) , (c) .
Answer
(a) yes, of exponential order for any ; (b) no, since for every ; (c) yes, it is bounded by (order ), although it oscillates wildly. - Let . Compute , then use to find without integrating.
Answer
, so , giving . - If , , , find .
Answer
- Find the transform of the sawtooth wave for , .
Answer
- Explain why is not the Laplace transform of any piecewise continuous function of exponential order.
Answer
By Theorem 9.1.1 such a transform must tend to as , but .